Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1990No. 6-88-058-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, Justice.

Carl Jenkins appeals from a conviction in a jury trial for the delivery of a simulated controlled substance. Jenkins’ punishment was assessed at forty years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Jenkins contends that the evidence is insufficient to show that he ever expressly represented the substance to be cocaine and that the evidence is insufficient because the record fails to show that he knew that the substance being delivered was not a controlled substance.

On May 29, 1988, Officers Steven Howard and Margaret Zoch, along with ten other officers of the Houston Police Department,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Boykin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Holliman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1985
  5. Simpson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Cleveland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API