Legal Opinion

McNeil v. Choate

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 13, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge McCandless

Affirming.

H. A. Choate sued Charlie McNeil and several others, alleging a conspiracy on their part to assault him, and that in pursuance thereof Chas. McNeil did assault, beat him, &c., and asked a recovery of $10-,000.00.

Defendants answered, denying a conspiracy and pleaded son assault demesne upon the part of Charlie McNeil. In the third paragraph Charlie McNeil sought to recover of plaintiff $15,000.00 for an assault and battery upon him in the same difficulty, and to this plaintiff pleaded self-defense.

All the defendants went out on a peremptory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alexander v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Goldnamer v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Edge v. OttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Acme Mills & Elevator Co. v. RivesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Hatfield v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nash v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Rockcastle Gas Company v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Hart v. GeyselWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Dixon v. SamartinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Warfield Natural Gas Company v. HammonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API