Legal Opinion
Sellers v. Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 1, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is conceded that the policy in suit lapsed on 12 July, 1932, for nonpayment of balance of the 12 May quarterly premium, unless strict compliance was waived by mailing notice of the next regular quarterly premium due 12 August, 1932, in accordance with the provisions of C. S., 6465.
As tending to support her claim of waiver, the plaintiff relies upon Murphy v. Ins. Co., 167 N. C., 334, 83 S. E., 461, and Moore v. Assurance Corp., 173 N. C., 532, 92 S. E., 362, but these authorities are not accordant with plaintiff’s position. Had the notice been a demand for the payment of the extended…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Iowa Life Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Moore v. General Accident, Fire, & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Hayworth v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Murphy v. Lafayette Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ampy v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Belk's Department Store v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Belk's Department Store v. George Washington Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. C.E. TuggleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Ampy v. Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.