Legal Opinion

Thibeadeau v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1989No. 09-86-142-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*539OPINION ON REMAND

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Steven Michael Thibeadeau revisited. On remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals, 761 S.W.2d 22. The direct appeal was ruled upon by this Court. See Thibeadeau v. State, 739 S.W.2d 482 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1987, pet. granted). The Court of Criminal Appeals, in a per curiam opinion, wrote:

“On direct appeal, appellant argued the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the law concerning good time and parole, inasmuch as the charge is predicated upon an unconstitutional statute. The court of appeals rejected appellant’s challenge to Article 37.07, Sec. 4,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Thibeadeau v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API