Legal Opinion
Chevette v. U-Haul Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 10, 1986No. 3935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in dismissing this action *618because the plaintiff failed to allege in his complaint facts sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction over the defendants.
The complaint alleged that the plaintiff entered into an agreement in New Mexico, whereby he rented a truck from the defendant U-Haul Company of New Mexico (U-Haul), a New Mexico corporation. The agreement provided that the truck was to be returned to U-Haul in Connecticut. Other allegations of the complaint were that the contract contained a “memorandum of insurance” which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Wallenta v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Demartino v. Disora, No. Cv90 03 05 09s (Nov. 27, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990
- Jepson v. Jepson, No. Fa97 0156588 S (Apr. 29, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.