Legal Opinion
Thomas
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Admiralty. Objections by surety to proposed decree.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
This was an action brought in forma pauperis, which was ended in the District Court by a decree dismissing the libel, with costs. 136 Fed. 693. An appeal was thereupon taken, and the decree below was affirmed (148 Fed. 762, 78 C. C. A. 428); the order of the Circuit Court of Appeals being as follows :
“It is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs, and that the said respondent, etc., recover against the said libel-ants, etc., §20 for his costs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brinkley v. Louisville & N. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1899
- Reed v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Volk v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- McClaskey v. BarrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- The Joseph B. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Expanded Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1910
- Central Manufacturing Co. v. B-M-K Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958
- Young v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1911