Expanded Metal Co. v. Bradford
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Action by the Expanded Metal Company and others against Eugene S. Bradford and others. Buie on the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland to show why judgment should not be had and execution issued against it as surety on an appeal bond.
1Opinion of the Court
HOEEAND, District Judge.
This was a rule on the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland to show cause why judgment should not be had and execution issued against it as surety on the appeal bond. The Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland was the surety on the defendant’s bond for costs, on appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals. The bond is in the sum of $500. The costs in the Circuit Court of Appeals amount to $185, and the costs in the Circuit Court are $257.61. The total for which the complainant contends the Surety Company is liable is $442.61. The latter, however, insists that it is only…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Central Manufacturing Co. v. B-M-K Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958
- Young v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1911