Legal Opinion
Central Manufacturing Co. v. B-M-K Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 10, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 1692PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This matter originally concerned an action of declaratory judgment concerning the validity of a patent. The patent was held invalid. An appeal has been noticed and a bond of $250 has been filed, pursuant to, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 73(c), 28 U.S.C.A., as set out in the footnote.1 Costs in the District Court have been taxed by the Clerk at $2,145.30 and no review as to such costs has been taken pursuant to Rule 54(d). The plaintiff, appellee, has filed a motion for an increase of the bond to $2,500 and this is opposed by the defendant, appellant.
The determination of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Potter v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- American Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Expanded Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Ex Rel. Terry Investment Co. v. United Funding & Investors, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1992