Aronson v. Orlov
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Bill in equity, filed in the Superior Court on July 21, 1914, and described in the opinion. In the Superior Court the suit was referred to a master. The material facts found by the master are described in the opinion. The defendants filed exceptions to and a motion to recommit the report, as well as several motions for leave to amend their answers, all of which are described in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Bill in equity, filed in the Superior Court on July 21, 1914, and described in the opinion. In the Superior Court the suit was referred to a master. The material facts found by the master are described in the opinion. The defendants filed exceptions to and a motion to recommit the report, as well as several motions for leave to amend their answers, all of which are described in the opinion. After a hearing by Fox, J., an interlocutory decree was entered by his order overruling the exceptions and denying the motions. The defendants moved that such interlocutory decree be vacated. After a…
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
The case, as stated in the bill, is that the plaintiffs are and for a long time have been manufacturers of petticoats in Boston and sellers of the same to large retail dealers in various parts of the country; that in November, 1912, one of them, named H. Aronson, conceived an invention to remedy some of the difficulties encountered in the use of close fitting petticoats by providing a certain amount of elasticity in connection with the seams; that later he filed an application for a patent on this invention; that the plaintiffs subsequently manufactured petticoats in accordance with the idea…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Brown v. DuchesneSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Wexler v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.