Legal Opinion

Balke v. Ream

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 2000No. WD 58175PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This appeal followed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Ream on Balke’s petition for damages, which was premised on Ream’s violation of Section 542.400-.424,1 Missouri’s wiretap statute (creating a class D felony for certain recordings of telephone conversations). This opinion is the fourth appellate decision stemming from a long-standing controversy between Richard Balke, a dairy farmer his electrical supplier, Central Missouri Electric Cooperative (CMEC). Harold Ream, the respondent, is the general manager of CMEC. A background of the prior and pending…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Porter v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Mullenix - St. Charles Properties, L.P. v. City of St. CharlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Y.G. v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wooten v. Pleasant Hope R-VI School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000
  2. Marc Perkel v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. William Colley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Neighbors Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API