Legal Opinion

Golden Condor, Inc. v. Bell

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1984No. 13690PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree quieting title to four unpatented lode mining claims in the Summit Mining District of Shoshone County. The district court ruled in favor of Golden Condor, Inc., the record owner of these claims. Velma Bell has challenged Golden Condor’s title upon the alternative postulates that her husband entered into a contract to buy the claims and that she “relocated” the claims upon an abandonment or forfeiture by Golden Condor. We vacate the decree and remand the case for further findings.

Mrs. Bell’s appeal has raised procedural, evidentiary and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Aldape v. AkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Viehweg v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Golden Condor, Inc. v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bergkamp v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. McAtee v. Faulkner Land & Livestock, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Matter of Estate of McGurrinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. FrancoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API