Bergkamp v. Martin
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
The Court’s prior opinion, dated December 4, 1987, is hereby withdrawn.
BURNETT, Judge.
This is the third appeal in an action for wrongful eviction of tenants from commercial property in Ketchum, Idaho. The issue presented this time is whether the district court correctly found that the terminated leasehold had no compensable value. For reasons explained below, we vacate the judgment and remand the case again.
I
The facts are fully set forth in prior appellate opinions. See Bergkamp v. Carrico, 101 Idaho 365, 613 P.2d 376 (1980) (hereinafter cited as Bergkamp I), and Bergkamp v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brand S Corp. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Greene v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Wm. G. Roe & Company v. Armour & Company, Armour & Company v. Wm. G. Roe & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Sibley v. JeffreysArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Bergkamp v. CarricoIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Campbell v. Parkway Surgery Center, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- All West Pet Supply Co. v. Hill's Pet Products DivisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Melaleuca, Inc. v. FoellerIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Gilbert v. Tony Russell ConstructionIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.