In Re Peterson v. Hawaii Electric Light Co.

LEVINSON, Justice.

The complainant-appellant Mark L. Peterson appeals the Public Utilities Commission’s (PUC) Decision and Order (D & 0) No. 13198, filed on April 4, 1994, dismissing his complaint against the Hawai'i Electric Light Company (HELCO) based upon the PUC’s determination that HELCO’s PohoiM Transmission Line No. 2 (PTL No. 2) was in substantial compliance with PUC’s D & 0 No. 10620. On appeal, we are asked to review the PUC’s finding that the PTL No. 2 was in substantial compliance with D & 0 No. 10620. We need not address this issue because we hold that this court lacks appellate…