Legal Opinion

Ingle v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 19, 2002No. 25416PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLER:

Petitioner was convicted of first degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor and lewd act upon a child and was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of thirty and five years, respectively. We granted his petition for a writ of certiorari to review the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We reverse.

*470ISSUE

Did the PCR court err in concluding that trial counsel was not ineffective?

DISCUSSION

Petitioner argues trial counsel undermined his defense in several respects and the PCR court erred in finding that counsel was not ineffective. We agree.

To establish a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Simpson v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Council v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API