Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Robinson

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 21, 2000No. CIV. PJM 95-190, CIV. PJM 94-2871, CIV. PJM 98-4109PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

The Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are current or former prisoners of the State of Maryland. 1 They allege that during the course of their confinement they have been involuntarily exposed to “environmental tobacco smoke” (ETS) to an extent violative of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794. With one exception, Defendants are or have been correctional administrators employed by the State of Maryland. 2 Plaintiffs seek (1) a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sensormatic Security Corporation v. Sensormatic Electronics CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  2. Bane v. Virginia Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2003
  3. Vales v. PreciadoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  4. Dillon v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  5. Bartlett v. PearsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API