Legal Opinion

United States v. Baldemar Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 1990No. 89-30064PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

May a state statute restore a convicted felon’s civil rights and thus effectively bar prosecution under a federal statute for unlawful possession of a firearm? After analysis of relevant Idaho and federal statutes we conclude the answer is “yes.”

I

Before his arrest in this case, Baldemar Gomez had been convicted in Idaho of five crimes punishable by imprisonment for terms exceeding one year. Over the course of approximately thirteen years, he had been convicted of second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, resisting an officer, possession of a controlled substance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Calvin CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. James Ray ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Otto Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin Allen JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. James A. EssigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Ronald DriscollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Michael Lee DahmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Gregory S. BrebnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API