Legal Opinion

Holling v. Chandler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1966No. Civ. 22216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is the propriety of an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial for errors of law. Plaintiff filed this action for personal injuries sustained in a collision with a vehicle 'driven by defendant. After the jury brought in a verdict for defendant, the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial because it had admitted into evidence, for the limited purpose of impeaching plaintiff’s expert witness, the results of an experiment conducted by defendant, and also because it failed to instruct the jury on the limited purpose for which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Beresford v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Garcia v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Culpepper v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Mendoza v. Club Car, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Lucas v. Hesperia Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Richard v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Schauf v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API