United States v. Allstate Mortgage Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants were indicted and convicted, in a court trial, on eleven mail fraud counts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Additionally, appellants Allstate and Karp were indicted and convicted on two and Karp alone on three false statement counts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1010.
SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE
Without going into the fetid details of appellants’ fraudulent schemes and false statements, it is sufficient to say that the record supports their convictions on each of the counts on which they were convicted. This is particularly true when we invoke the rule in Glasser v. United States, 315…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Joseph MayburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Walter Morrison A/K/A "Skip" Morrison Appeal of Nick BosciaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Jack Moody Stricklin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- United States v. St. Michael's Credit Union and Janice SacharczykCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Lewis F. Shelton, James Darrough, John Derry, Donald Burks, and Carl BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.