Legal Opinion

Wandel v. Wandel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1926No. 5,900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This action was instituted by the plaintiff to secure a divorce on the ground of wilful desertion. The original answer made by the defendant was merely a general denial of the allegation of the complaint which charged such desertion. The record does not disclose when the complaint or answer was filed, or when the order was made setting the cause for trial; but on June 12, 1925, upon notice, defendant moved the court for leave to file an amended answer and the motion was granted without terms. The amended answer, in addition to the denials, included a cross-complaint which charged the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. BudziszWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Boles v. BolesMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Sandeen v. Russell Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Callan v. HampleMontana Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hardie v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Lewis v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Burns v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Herrin v. HerrinMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Granger v. ErieMontana Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API