Legal Opinion

Valentine v. Sloss

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894No. 15432PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This is an action brought to recover possession of land under section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff claims title derived from the heirs of Juan Read, who received a grant from the Mexican government. His claim was presented to the board of land commissioners, and by them confirmed. Patent issued to the confirmees February 25, 3885, and this action was commenced February 21, 1890.

This appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon a statement of the case. The statement contains the following:

“ It appeared from other documentary evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. San Francisco City and County v. Le RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Moore v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Chipley v. FarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Gardiner v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Forgeus v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  4. Howard v. Oroville School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API