General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Bergquist
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The insureds demanded the protection afforded by the terms of the policy and threatened legal action to compel the insurer to pay any amount for which the insureds might be held liable to the contractors in the Sauk county action. The insurer asserted certain policy defenses *170and claimed it was not obligated to defend the insureds in the Sauk county action nor to pay the amount of any judgment therein.
After the insureds executed the nonwaiver agreement, the insurer did conduct the defense of the Sauk county action. It could have continued to defend until final judgment. If the judgment went…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nelson v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Kelley Lumber Co. v. WoelfelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Kerkhoff v. American Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Norse Chemical Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Adams v. Crater Well Drilling, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Rural Mutual Insurance v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- GEBHARDT BROS., INC. v. BrimmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Admiral Insurance v. Paper Converting Machine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.