Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided January 11, 2005No. SC 86050PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR., Judge.
Respondents, who are members of the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, and certain named officers of the St. Louis Police Department1 filed a declaratory judgment action against the State of Missouri, the Attorney General, the Commissioner of Administration and the State Treasurer alleging that respondents are entitled to coverage under the State Legal Expense Fund (“SLEF”), sec. 105.711 et seq., RSMo 2000. The SLEF provides for representation by the Attorney General and reimbursement for monies expended in defending certain lawsuits and for satisfaction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State ex rel. Hawes v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- State ex rel. Police Commissioners v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
- Cates v. WebsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Sayad v. ZychSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Yvonne Thomas v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners Mary Nelson Michael J. Quinn Susan Rollins Bartholomew Saracino Francis G. Slay, MayorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Public School Retirement System v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Green v. MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
- Hodges v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- P.L.S. ex rel. Shelton v. KosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.