Legal Opinion

Cates v. Webster

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 14, 1987No. 68382PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

Appellant, a bailiff in the Associate Division of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, was named defendant in an action sounding in tort, styled Wilton v. Cates (hereinafter Wilton), in the Jackson County Circuit Court. Thereafter appellant filed this petition for declaratory judgment seeking a determination of his rights and respondent’s responsibilities in the pending tort action under §§ 105.711 and 105.716, RSMo 1986. The trial court held that respondent, the Attorney General of Missouri, is not obligated to represent appellant in the tort action nor are moneys from the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BuderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. Schroeder Ex Rel. Schroeder v. HorackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Weinstein v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Vaughan v. Taft Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Wright v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. Cravens v. NixonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Dixon v. HoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. P.L.S. ex rel. Shelton v. KosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Boone County v. County Employees' Retirement FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API