Legal Opinion · Dissent

Polland & Cook v. Lehmann

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 11, 1992No. 01-90-01099-CVPublished

1DissentO’Connor, Justice

This case presents the issue of whether a lawyer who refers a case to another lawyer because of a conflict of interest may claim a referral fee. I would hold that he cannot and would affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The disciplinary rules

Polland claims the trial court erred in holding that Fleming v. Campbell, 537 S.W.2d 118, 119 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e.) and Lemond v. Jamail, 763 S.W.2d 910, 914 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, writ denied), prevent his recovery.

Polland contends that Quorum, acting on behalf of the clients, agreed to the referral fee.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'HARA v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Baron v. Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy & Baab, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Fleming v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Musslewhite v. State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API