Legal Opinion

Baron v. Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy & Baab, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1981No. 8951PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLEIL, Justice.

This is a suit between lawyers seeking to declare valid and enforceable a written contract to divide part of a fee. The trial was to a jury, and after both sides rested, each requested that the case be withdrawn from the jury and judgment entered in their behalf. The trial court withdrew the case from the jury, and entered a judgment declaring the agreement between these lawyers valid and enforceable.

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly declared the agreement to be valid and enforceable. We hold that the trial court properly granted the declaratory judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Scott v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Austin Building Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Holstein v. GrossmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Garcia v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  3. Quintero v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  4. Walker v. GribbleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Greenbriar North Section II, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API