Legal Opinion

State v. Carlson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 2002No. 41A01-0105-CR-192PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-plaintiff the State of Indiana appeals the trial court's grant of appeliee-defendant Seth Carlson's motion to suppress. More specifically, the State contends that the trial court erred in suppressing the evidence of marijuana in the vehicle because: 1) the police had probable cause to search the vehicle, and 2) the police searched the trunk in accordance with the "inventory-search" exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.

FACTS

On the evening of May 8, 2000, the Johnson County Sheriff's Office received an anonymous phone call reporting that a brown…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. People v. KazmierczakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LefeversIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Jefferson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. SeidlIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API