Legal Opinion
State v. Hicks
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 2008No. 41A05-0708-CR-482PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Case Summary and Issues
The State of Indiana appeals the trial court’s grant of Ruth Hicks’s motion to suppress evidence against her. The State raises the sole issue of whether the trial court improperly suppressed the evidence. Concluding the trial court’s grant of the motion to suppress was contrary to law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Facts and Procedural History
On August 2, 2005, at roughly 2:45 a.m., Officer Kevin Sherman, of the Franklin Police Department, was dispatched based on the report of a vehicle stopped on railroad tracks. When Officer Sherman…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Muncie v. United National Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Joseph Matheny v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ryan E. Bean v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Robert E. Hicks v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ashley Reid v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.