Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Seidl

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2010No. 19A01-1006-CR-309PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Pursuant to Indiana Code Section 35-38-4-2(5), the State appeals the trial court's order granting Robert J. Seidl's motion to suppress the State's evidence against him. The State raises a single issue for our review, namely, whether the trial court erred when it granted Seidl's motion to suppress. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Sometime before November 14, 2009, Dubois County Deputy Sheriff John Thomas Anderson received an anonymous complaint of methamphetamine production at 8025 State Road 64, Seidl's…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. QuirkIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hardister v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. ReinierSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Robert Trimble v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jermaine Hines v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Charles Hall v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State of Indiana v. Larry O. JanesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Brian Keith Petro v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Elizabeth Mayne v. O'Bannon Publishing Company, Inc., d/b/a Corydon Instant PrintIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API