Legal Opinion
State v. England
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided May 30, 2000No. M1997-00254-SC-R11-COPublishedCited by 239 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C. J.
in which DROWOTA, HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ., joined.
This is an appeal from the Criminal Court for Sumner County, which granted the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from a canine sweep of his legally detained motor vehicle. The trial court concluded that a canine sweep is not a search under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution but nonetheless held that the officer’s investigation should have ceased upon the defendant’s refusal to consent to a search. The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed with the State that, because a canine sweep is not a search under the…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. OdomTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by239 opinions
- Fields v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Jones v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Gdongalay P. Berry v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.