Lee v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Graham. A. G. McAlister, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of conviction of the crime of extortion. Complaint is made of errors (1) in overruling a demurrer to the information for insufficient facts to constitute the offense of extortion; (2) the admission of evidence over objection; and (3) the giving of erroneous instructions to the jury. We will consider these assignments in their order.
The charging part of the information is as follows:
‘ ‘ The said Robert E. Lee, on or about the 7th day of November, 1912, and before the filing of the information in the county of Graham, state of Arizona, did willfully,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Commonwealth v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- State v. DeboltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Fertig v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cahill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- McKenzie v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Richardson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Territory v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.