State v. Burns
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.
The appellants were convicted of the crime of extortion. They have appealed from the judgment and sentence on the verdict.
Omitting the formal parts, the information in substance charged: That the defendants on April 1, 1929, with intent to extort and gain the sum of five thousand dollars, did verbally threaten to accuse Leland Frease of the crime of grand larceny, and, by means of such threats, did extort and gain from him the sum of four thousand dollars.
The statute, § 2610, Rem. Comp. Stat., on which the information is based, provides:
“Every person, who, under circumstances not amounting to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In re SHERINSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. DeboltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- People v. ChoynskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. RichardsWashington Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. FichtherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- State v. GreenspanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Bair v. Spokane Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. PaulingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. PaulingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.