Legal Opinion

Long v. Martin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1926No. 7245PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This action is an original one for mandamus. The application is made by H. A. Long, W. H. McCullough, Ed McCullough, Tom L. McCullough and his wife, Kate 0. McCullough, against M. E. Martin, Leslie Stegall, Sheriff of McLennan County, the Honorable Giles P. Lester, Judge of the Seventy-fourth District Court of McLennan County, and certain other parties. The facts and issues involved, in so far as may be necessary to an understanding thereof, may be found in the reported case of Long v. Martin, 115 Texas, 519, 285 S. W., 1075, in an opinion rendered when the matters now presented were before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Long v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Long v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cavers v. Sioux Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PribbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Browning-Ferris MacHinery Co. v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Garlington v. WassonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API