Legal Opinion

Long v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1921No. 1762PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, Wichita County; Edgar Scurry, Judge. Suit by M. E. Martin against H. A. Long and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

Defendant in error, Martin, sued plaintiffs in error H. A. Long, W. H. McCullough, and the City National Bank of Wichita Falls, in the district court of Wichita county, to recover liquidated damages for an alleged breach of a certain contract for the sale of an oil lease on 10 acres of land, alleged to be out of a 30-acre tract in survey No. 62 in that county. We shall refer to the parties on this appeal, plaintiff in error as plaintiff, and defendant in error as defendant. The plaintiffs answered by general and special exceptions, general denial, and specially answering, among other things,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Jenkins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Collier v. BettertonTexas Supreme Court · 1895

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Wooten v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Raney v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Zucht v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Caprito v. Grisham-Hunter CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API