Legal Opinion

Long Beach Land & Water Co. v. Richardson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1886No. 11510PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

This was an action of forcible entry and detainer against the parties defendants, who were charged *207with having forcibly entered upon about twenty feet square of the seashore of which, it was alleged, the plaintiff was in the exclusive possession at the time of the entry. The entry was made on the twenty-seventh day of July, 1885.

At the trial of the issues made by the pleadings in the case, the court granted a nonsuit, upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to prove actual and peaceable possession by the plaintiff of the locus in quo at the time of the defendants’ entry thereon.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. PachecoSupreme Court of the United States · 1865

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Forgeus v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Freeman v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API