Legal Opinion

Love v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 2, 1990No. Record 890413PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiting

There are two issues in this case: (1) whether a plaintiff, who fell to the floor and was injured after sitting on a properly positioned toilet seat she knew was loose, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, and (2) whether a landlord is liable for an independent contractor’s negligence in failing to perform the landlord’s common-law duty to maintain the common areas of an office building in a reasonably safe condition.

On March 23, 1984, Winfree H. Slater, Inc. (Slater) contracted to manage Edward F. Schmidt, Jr.’s office building at 1214 West-over Hills Boulevard in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. HedrickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. Richmond & Manchester Railway Co. v. Moore's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Murray v. HadidSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Kesler v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Monroe E. Berkman v. United States of America, & Third Party v. Arrow General, Incorporated, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Sanchez v. Medicorp Health SystemSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Jenkins v. PylesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  5. Estate of Moses v. SW VA TRANSIT MANAG.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API