Goldsmith v. Tub-O-Wash
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
On March 17, 1958, the parties executed a written lease whereby the plaintiff, Clair Goldsmith, leased to the defendant, Tub-O-Wash, a California corporation, the entire ground floor of a building at 4300 Grove Street, in Oakland, and the adjacent parking lot. The lease was for a term of five years, commencing April 1, 1958, at a total rental of $6,000. As there was a rental residence apartment located above the rear portion of the leased premises, the plaintiff reserved to her own use the “exterior wall and roof of the demised premises. ’ ’
On November 9, 1959, plaintiff filed her first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Shea v. LeonisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Butt v. BertolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Enos v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alexander v. Abbey of the ChimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Pearl v. ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971