Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Tub-O-Wash

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1962No. Civ. 19969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

On March 17, 1958, the parties executed a written lease whereby the plaintiff, Clair Goldsmith, leased to the defendant, Tub-O-Wash, a California corporation, the entire ground floor of a building at 4300 Grove Street, in Oakland, and the adjacent parking lot. The lease was for a term of five years, commencing April 1, 1958, at a total rental of $6,000. As there was a rental residence apartment located above the rear portion of the leased premises, the plaintiff reserved to her own use the “exterior wall and roof of the demised premises. ’ ’

On November 9, 1959, plaintiff filed her first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Shea v. LeonisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Butt v. BertolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Enos v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Abbey of the ChimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Pearl v. ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API