Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Navratil

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 2, 1966No. 1 CA-CIV 65PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., Superior Court Judge.

Plaintiffs Navratil obtained judgment below, rescinding a contract for sale of real property and for $4,000.00 in damages against defendants Godfrey. Godfreys appeal from the judgment and their main assignment of error is that the court’s findings and conclusions, based on the evidence, as a matter of law do not entitle plaintiffs to judgment. We must agree with appellants.

The evidence necessary for this decision, and taken in the light most favorable to sustain the lower court’s judgment, is as follows: In March of 1959, Godfreys sold some property…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. O'Malley v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. University of Richmond v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Universal Investment Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Berry v. RobotkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Horne v. TimbanardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Gonzalez v. US Human Rights NetworkDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API