Legal Opinion
Hill v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 11, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 7889PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
Must the seller of a residence disclose to the buyer facts pertaining to past termite infestation? This is the primary question presented in this appeal. Plaintiffs Warren G. Hill and Gloria R. Hill (buyers) filed suit to rescind an agreement to purchase a residence. Buyers alleged that Ora G. Jones and Barbara R. Jones (sellers) had made misrepresentations concerning termite damage in the residence and had failed to disclose to them the existence of the damage and history of termite infestation in the residence. The trial court dismissed the claim for misrepresentation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Johnson v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ray v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Obde v. SchlemeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Sound Techniques, Inc. v. HoffmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Stemple v. DobsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Formento v. Encanto Business ParkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.