Legal Opinion

Drake v. O'Brien

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1925No. C. C. 350PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This cause comes here on certificate. The sufficiency of the amended bill is challenged by demurrer, the court below finding no equity in the pleading. This cause has been here before. Drake v. O’Brien, 83 W. Va. 678. The facts on which the litigation is founded are thus stated there by the Court with perspicuity:

“This appeal seeks review of three decrees entered, respectively, March 19, 1914, April 6, 1917, and March 28, 1918. The last one awarding the plaintiffs a right of accounting for oil, coal and timber taken from a tract of land containing about 1,000 acres, throughout a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  4. Taylor v. BenhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  5. Toothman v. CourtneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Hager v. Exxon Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Staud v. SillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mairs v. Central Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API