Legal Opinion

Berrien Springs Water-Power Co. v. Berrien Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1903No. Docket No. 209PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Mandamus by the Berrien Springs Water-Power Company to compel Willis B. Perkins, circuit judge, presiding in Berrien county, to vacate an order dismissing a petition to condemn certain land.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

In Valentine v. Berrien Springs Water-Power Co., 128 Mich. 280 (87 N. W. 370), this court held that relator had a right to proceed to erect a dam across St. Joseph river. To carry out this project, relator filed a petition to condemn certain lands in pursuance of authority contained in the act under which it is incorporated. Respondent dismissed said petition on the ground that that part of the act which authorized relator to condemn lands was unconstitutional. This court is now asked to issue a mandamus compelling the vacation of such order. While other questions are raised in this case,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Health v. Van HoesenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ryerson v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railroad v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Valentine ex rel. Dudley v. Berrien Springs Water-Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. In Re Slum Clearance Between Hastings, Gratiot, De Quindre and Mullett StreetsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Shizas v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Detroit International Bridge Co. v. American Seed Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API