Legal Opinion

Margaret E. Peter, Administratrix and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Ralph M. Peter, Deceased, in No. 15465 v. Public Constructors, Inc., and Public Contracting Corporation, and Third-Party and in No. 15466 v. Cunningham Construction Co., and Reid Construction Company, a Delaware Corp., Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 21, 1966No. 15466Published

1Opinion of the Court

368 F.2d 111

Margaret E. PETER, Administratrix and Administratrix ad

Prosequendum of the Estate of Ralph M. Peter,

Deceased, Appellant in No. 15465,

v.

PUBLIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC., and Public Contracting

Corporation, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, and

Appellants in No. 15466,

v.

CUNNINGHAM CONSTRUCTION CO., and

Reid Construction Company, a Delaware Corp., Third-Party Defendants.

Nos. 15465, 15466.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 26, 1966.

Decided Oct. 21, 1966.

Milton M. Borowsky, Abraham E. Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille, Camden,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Tungus v. SkovgaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Silveus v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Cephas E. Sword and Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Intervener v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API