Legal Opinion

Piersol v. Northeast Kansas Production Credit Ass'n (In re Piersol)

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 12, 1983No. Bankruptcy No. 82-21040; Civ. A. No. 83-2268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This appeal from a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas presents the question of whether non-contiguous parcels of farmland can be a homestead within the meaning of the Kansas Constitution, Article 15, Section 9, and K.S.A. 60-2301.

In a well-reasoned opinion, the bankruptcy court ruled that contiguity is a requirement of the Kansas law and therefore that a 150-acre parcel of non-contiguous farmland owned by appellants was not entitled to the homestead exemption. This court agrees.

Appellants, debtors in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Randal v. ElderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. Linn County Bank v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Estate of Dittemore v. DittemoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Meech v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re SauerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API