Piersol v. Northeast Kansas Production Credit Ass'n (In re Piersol)
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This appeal from a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas presents the question of whether non-contiguous parcels of farmland can be a homestead within the meaning of the Kansas Constitution, Article 15, Section 9, and K.S.A. 60-2301.
In a well-reasoned opinion, the bankruptcy court ruled that contiguity is a requirement of the Kansas law and therefore that a 150-acre parcel of non-contiguous farmland owned by appellants was not entitled to the homestead exemption. This court agrees.
Appellants, debtors in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Randal v. ElderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Linn County Bank v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Estate of Dittemore v. DittemoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Meech v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re SauerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2009