United States v. Moses
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington. This is an action arising upon a contract entered into between the appellant and the appellee in May, 1900, in the city of Seattle, state of Washington, wherein the appellee agreed to enter the employment of the government of the United States, under the full and complete direction of the chief quartermaster, department of Alaska, for such time as might be required…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington. This is an action arising upon a contract entered into between the appellant and the appellee in May, 1900, in the city of Seattle, state of Washington, wherein the appellee agreed to enter the employment of the government of the United States, under the full and complete direction of the chief quartermaster, department of Alaska, for such time as might be required for the completion of the work in contemplation, and to receive therefor the sum of í?5 per working day, and…
1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Act Cong. Aug. 1, 1892, c. 352, § 1, 27 Stat. 340, 2 Supp. Rev. St. p. 62 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2521], relating to the limitation of the hours of daily service of laborers and mechanics employed upon the public works of the United States, provides:
“That the service and employment of all laborers and mechanics who are now or may hereafter be employed by the government of the United States, by the District of Columbia, or by any contractor or subcontractor upon any of the public works of the United States or of the said District of Columbia, is hereby…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McCarthy v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- United States v. PostSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Schurr v. SavignyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Grisell v. Noel Bros. Flour, Feed Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stephens v. BorgmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Veader v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
- Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1918
- Swisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1922
- Filardo v. Foley Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.