Legal Opinion

Veader v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 24, 1948No. Civ. A. 7275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ complaint states a cause of action in four counts claiming compensation for overtime work and for failure to pay appropriate minimum wages.

Count 1 names the Bay State Dredging & Contracting Company as defendant, and sets forth a cause of action under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219.

Count II alleges that Bay State has failed to pay minimum wages according to the schedule of prevailing wages required by the Bacon-Davis Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 276a et seq., and that the United States has withheld from Bay State certain sums on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1968
  2. Finnan v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lopez Castro v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API