Legal Opinion
Kalenze v. Federal Crop Insurance (In Re Kalenze)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota
Decided August 3, 1994No. 19-30123PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM A. HILL, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter arose by Complaint filed January 28, 1994, with the plaintiffs/Debtors claiming the defendant Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC), effectuated a pre-petition setoff which constitutes a recoverable preference. The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment and the parties, by stipulation, have agreed that no genuine issue of fact exists and the issue may be resolved as a matter of law. Accordingly, the court finds the facts as material to be as follows:
Findings of Fact
The Kalenzes, during their farming years, purchased crop…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Small Business Administration v. McClellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States of America, Acting Through the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service v. Willis R. GerthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- In Re ContiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
- In Re RinehartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re AlvstadUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1998
- In Re TilleryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1995
- In Re SauerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1998
- Turner v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.