Legal Opinion
In Re Rinehart
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 24, 1987No. 19-40039PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PEDER K. ECKER, Bankruptcy Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is before the Court on an amended motion for order to show cause filed on behalf of Harold and Marilyn Rinehart (“debtors”) by Attorney James P. Hurley on May 18, 1987. 1 Debtors substantively allege: 1) the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) does not have a right to offset its prefiling claims against Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service-Commodity Credit Corporation (“ASCS-CCC”) farm program payments owed by the ASCS-CCC to the debtors to satisfy prefiling claims of the SBA because this is not a “mutual…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Johnson v. First National Bank Of MontevideoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States of America on Behalf of Its Agency Internal Revenue Service v. William H. Norton, Carrie W. Norton, F/k/a Carrie A. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Homer National Bank v. NamieDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1989
- United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. RinehartDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
- Blanton v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (In Re Blanton)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Jarboe v. United States Small Business Administration (In Re Hancock)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re BrittonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.