Legal Opinion

Judd v. Mutual Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 31, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The lease, in addition to the customary general clause providing for re-entry and termination by the lessor in case of default in payment of rent or any of the covenants, contained the following provision: “This lease is made further upon the express condition that in the event of any assignment for the benefit of the creditors of the party of the second part for voluntary or involuntary liquidation, that forthwith and immediately this lease shall expire and terminate and the party of the first part be entitled to immediate possession and occupancy of the within premises.” The principal issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judd v. Mutual Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Needy v. MiddlekauffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. Paust v. GeorgianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Bridge-Mile Shoe Corporation v. Liggett Drug Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Bander v. Leverty Drug Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API