Legal Opinion

Amax Coal Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided December 31, 1996No. EV 94-79-C R/HPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BROOKS, District Judge.

The Court, having heard all the evidence and arguments of the parties, now enters its findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). Any conclusion of law mischaracter-ized as fact shall be hereby deemed a statement of fact and conversely any statement of fact improperly labeled a conclusion of law shall be deemed a statement of fact.

Findings of Fact

This case concerns the assessment of Black Lung Excise Taxes (“BLET”). Federal legislation of coal mining commenced shortly after, and arguably in response…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emerald International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. United States v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
  3. Amax Coal Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Pipitone v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API