Legal Opinion

FMS Management Systems, Inc. v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 8226SC1285PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Defendants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motions for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment and granting plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings since the subject of the Florida judgment is against the policy of and could not have been entertained in a North Carolina court. We find no merit in defendants’ contention.

Under G.S. 45-21.38, which abolishes deficiency judgments in purchase money transactions if foreclosure on the security yields an insufficient amount to satisfy the indebtedness, plaintiff could not have instituted action…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. M & R INVESTMENTS, CO. INC. v. HackerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. GNLV CORP. v. FeatherstoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. MGM Desert Inn, Inc. v. HolzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API