Goldstein v. GTE Products Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
The trial court denied Goldstein’s motion for directed verdict and directed a verdict against him in this suit by GTE against Goldstein on his personal guaranty for the open account of Lee Products. Goldstein appeals- on three grounds. Held:
1. Appellant was not entitled to directed verdict on grounds that the appellee GTE Products failed to prove that it is an entity entitled to enforce appellant’s personal guaranty to “GTE Sylvania Incorporated and/or any subsidiaries and affiliates.” The accounting statement of GTE Products Corporation upon which GTE claimed $12,177.60 on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Johnson v. CurentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Prince & Paul v. Don Mitchell's WLAQ, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Boxwood Corp. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Parker v. Centrum International Film Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rigg v. New World Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Rigg v. New World Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987